top of page

Owning the ball doesn't mean owning the market.


Watching the World Cup from a strategic perspective, some things become clearer in my mind.


One of them is this:


Possession of the ball does not mean possession of the game.


A team can make more passes throughout the match.

He can dribble the ball more.

He may be more visible in the field.

It might seem like they're attacking more.


But the final score might say something else.


Because in football, it's not just about having possession of the ball.


What matters is what you produce when you have possession of the ball.


Can you create space?

Can you disrupt your opponent?

Can you enter the dangerous zone?

Can you change your opponent's balance?

Are you able to make the right decision that leads to the desired outcome?


This reminds me a lot of the business world.


Companies sometimes have too much possession of the ball, too.


They hold many meetings.

They produce a lot of reports.

They initiate many projects.

They launch many campaigns.

They prepare many presentations.

They develop many products.

They collect a lot of data.

They talk a lot about strategy.


But all of this alone doesn't mean you'll own the market.


Because in the business world, it's not the activity that matters, but the impact.


Does the customer see more value?

Does the market perceive you more clearly?

Is the brand establishing a stronger presence in the customer's mind?

Is the quality of sales improving?

Does the customer find a stronger reason to choose you?

Is the organization really making faster and smarter decisions?


If the answer is no, you may have the ball, but you haven't won the game.


I think this is where many companies' strategic mistake begins.


We mistake movement for progress.

We mistake intensity for productivity.

We think visibility is impact.

We mistake market share for customer loyalty.

We tend to think the number of meetings reflects the quality of management.

We mistake data collection for generating insights.


But in this new era of competition, the real question is:


It's not about how much possession you have, but how much value you create with the possession you have.


It's the same in football.


Some teams achieve a lot with very little possession.

Some people produce little with a lot of effort.


In the business world, too, some companies create a big impact with small resources.

Some, however, produce only great dynamism with vast resources.


I don't watch matches.


I'm reading about the new nature of competition.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page