top of page

Rising Brands That Lose Their Lead: Why Do They Fail?


At one point, they were everywhere. They grew rapidly, received investment, and were talked about. They were declared the "future" of the sector.

Then one day… they quietly disappeared.

 

This article is about the stories of brands that never seemed to fail but ultimately disappeared by losing their leadership . Because most brands vanish not because they did something wrong, but because they failed to update what they were doing right in a timely manner.

 

1. Rising to the top and remaining a leader are not the same thing.

 

The rise of a brand is often driven by a single muscle:

  • a good product,

  • correct timing,

  • aggressive marketing,

  • a strong founder,

  • or a gap in the market.

 

But staying a leader is a completely different game. Rising brands believe: "What got us here will take us forward." That's where the first turning point begins.

 

Typical scenario:

  • A brand solves a problem very well.

  • It scales rapidly.

  • The market accepts it as a "reference".

  • The following sentences begin to circulate inside:

    • "We are already the leaders."

    • "Our competitors are watching us."

    • "The customer has to choose us."

 

From this point on, the brand transforms from a learning organization into a repetitive one.

 

2. Success Blinds Brands

 

Success often leads brands to look for external threats: new competitors, price-cutting players, regulations, technology… However, the real problem for brands losing their leadership is internal.

 

The most common types of blindness are:

 

  • Thinking you "understand" the customer

The brand is still referencing the old customer profile. However, the customer has changed:

  • Expectations have increased.

  • His patience has run out.

  • The alternatives have increased.

The brand misses this point:

Every day, the customer questions again why they chose you.

 

  • Trusting past instincts, not data.

"We know this market well" is the last resort for many brands.

But here's the market information:

  • not static,

  • not transferable,

  • The past cannot be successfully preserved.

 

  • Over-focusing on internal success stories.

Brands that lose their leading position generally:

  • their own success presentations,

  • their old campaigns,

  • He recounts the narratives of the "golden age" over and over again.

These narratives stop inspiring after a while; they put you to sleep.

 

3. As the scale increases, courage decreases.

 

Rising brands are bold:

  • He is not afraid to try.

  • makes quick decisions.

  • He takes risks.

But as they grow older, the following happens:

  • Decision-making processes become longer.

  • Approval mechanisms multiply,

  • The tolerance for making mistakes decreases.

 

Conclusion?

The brand is now:

  • He is cautious, not innovative.

  • He is a defender, not a pioneer.

  • They become someone who tries to protect the game, not someone who sets the rules.

This is a very critical breaking point.

Because the market rewards not those who advocate for leadership, but those who redefine it.

 

4. Starting to Optimize Instead of Developing a Strategy

 

Many brands are failing because they are "working very hard." But they're in the wrong place.

 

A common scenario we see:

  • A better campaign

  • Lower cost

  • Faster delivery

  • More KPIs

These are all examples of optimization.

 

But this question is never asked:

"Are we still playing the right game?"

Brands that are losing their leading position:

  • It improves the process, rather than the strategy.

  • Instead of focusing on the vision, it follows the dashboard.

  • They talk about quarterly targets instead of future targets.

Optimization makes the wrong strategy lose value faster.

 

5. If the culture doesn't change, the brand can't change.

 

Brands generally try to change the outside world:

  • positioning,

  • language of communication,

  • logo,

  • slogan.

 

But inside:

  • decision-making process

  • risk perception,

  • feedback culture

It remains the same.


The most dangerous sentences:

  • "We tried this before, it didn't work."

  • "It won't work in our industry."

  • "The customer isn't ready for this."

These sentences indicate that a brand is closing itself off to the future.

 

Leading brands do the following:

  • He/She calls into question his/her old truths,

  • He is not afraid to dismantle his own business model.

  • He creates a rival from within.

 

6. A Common Summary of Brands That Have Lost Leadership

 

Generally, when a brand goes bankrupt:

  • Sales are still ongoing.

  • Brand awareness remains high.

  • The team is still busy.

 

But these three things are not:

  1. A clear narrative of the future.

  2. A current relationship with the customer

  3. A bold strategic position

In other words, the brand appears to be standing strong, but it has lost its direction.

 

7. So how is leadership maintained?

 

This article is not pessimistic. On the contrary, it is a cautionary tale.

Brands that maintain their leadership:

  • He considers success to be temporary,

  • It is constantly repositioned,

  • Instead of saying "this is who we are," he asks "what are we becoming?"

 

A simple but difficult principle:

If you don't question today what made you successful yesterday, it will ruin you tomorrow.

 

True leadership:

  • not about reaching the summit,

  • not about staying at the top,

  • It's about redefining the peak every time.

 

Remember;

 

Today's biggest risk isn't competition, technology, or crisis. The biggest risk is thinking you're still the leader. And the good news is: for brands that realize this, the game is still going on!

 

 

Dr. Hakan TETIK

Comments


bottom of page